The chief adviser to the interim government. Muhammad Yunus and the Anti -Corruption Commission (ACC) have been accused of trying to interfere with British politics and run a 'planned campaign' to destroy British politics. Dr. The allegations were filed in a lawyer sent by Tulip along with Yunus and ACC, British media reported Sky News.
In the notice, Tulip said, 'Dr. Damn his reputation. The main purpose of Yunus and the ACC. At the same time, they have raised these allegations to interfere with UK politics, especially Tulip's own constituency, its political parties and the country service, which is not acceptable in any way. '
Tulip sent the notice through Stephenson Harwood LLP, a UK -based legal organization. The interim government has also been criticized for not responding to any previous letter given to him in the notice.
In the notice of the lawyer, Tulip said that letters were sent to the ACC chairman and commissioners on March 7 and April 7. Then a letter was sent to the chief adviser Yunus on June 7.
In the notice, Stephenson Harwood, a legal company, says, “We have not yet received a letter from Tulip Siddique. As we have made it clear in the letter, Tulip Siddique is the victim of a planned operation, which is the chief adviser and the ACC. In our correspondence, we have shown why every allegation against Tulip is untrue. '
The decision not to meet Yunus in a lawyer's notice was criticized, saying, “Tulip took the initiative to meet Yunus' visit to London.
He wanted to discuss with Yunus about the allegations of the ACC. But the chief adviser sadly failed to accept Tulip's proposal. '
Stephenson Haroud has also criticized the reason for not meeting Tulip in an interview to the BBC. The notice said, “In an interview with BBC Radio, Yunus asked two specific issues. First, he is disappointed not to meet the British Prime Minister.
Secondly, why did he not meet Tulip. '
It also said, 'The chief adviser took a surprise position in this regard. He said that day it was a legal process and he didn't want to interfere with it. '
The notice stated, “We were expecting that the chief adviser would verify the information properly before making a complaint against a UK elected public representative. He should have kept in mind that when the ACC is claiming that the investigation is underway, it is not advisable to publicly criticize Tulip. '
Stephenson Harwood thinks there may be two reasons for refusing to sit down with Tulip. First, the allegations made by the chief adviser against Tulip are false.
Stephenson Harwood says Yunus had the opportunity to open up these false allegations sitting with Tulip. But he decided to stay behind the ACC without taking that opportunity, which seems to be the second reason for us to reject Tulip's proposal.
A copy of the notice sent along with the ACC Chairman has also been sent to the chief adviser. In the notice, Tulip said, “Considering the overall situation, it is time for the chief adviser and ACC to withdraw from these false propaganda.”
Stephenson Harwood says, please make sure that the ACC's investigation has stopped. We are clear that if this letter and our previous letters do not respond properly by June 5, Tulip Siddique will reasonably take the matter to be over.
Sky News Professor Dr. on legal notice. Yunus Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam said the chief adviser of Bangladesh and the Anti -Corruption Commission (ACC) had no reason or opportunity to interfere in British politics. The Anti-Corruption Commission does not depend on the rumor, but depends on the testimony and the testimony of the witness.
The press secretary also said, “We hope the British legal system and British press will realize that the trial of any case will be settled in the court in accordance with the law of the country concerned.” Since the court has summoned Tulip and the warrant has been issued, it is now his own responsibility to clarify his position in the court.
He also said that if he wants legal assistance and is unable to get it himself, Bangladesh will provide it. However, if Tulip deliberately ignores the court's call, then the proceedings of the case may be taken forward in his absence.
